Epstein Secrets

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

property (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and S11 million in other assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn't public, so EFTA00204660 Page 12 The Talen

epose him." "Front the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it wculd seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get . . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e.. the much la

operty (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach). and 511 million in other assets. including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of deb!. and it wasn't public. so it was meaningless :o attach a f

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the paemment was Pk:titans a bee hat:- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "Thev went for what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger a

operty (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach). and SI) million in other assets. including his investment in Riddell. A co-inwpor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt. Ind it wasn't public. so it was memingless to attach a figu

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

l property (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and $11 million in other assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: “The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn’t public, so it was meaningless to attach a figu

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. -They went for what they knew they could get .. . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger

operty (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach). and S11 million in other assets. including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt. ind it wasn't public. so it was meaningless :o attach a f

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who repre- sented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much la

property (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and $11 million in other assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn't public, so it was meaningless to attach a fi

epose him:" ""From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much la

operty (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and S11 million in other assets. including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: "The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt. and it wasn't public, so it was meaningless to attach a f

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

l property (although he told sources that he had already bought the home in Palm Beach), and $11 million in other assets, including his investment in Riddell. A co-investor in Riddell says: “The company had been bought with a huge amount of debt, and it wasn’t public, so it was meaningless to attach a figu