o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the paemment was Pk:titans a bee hat:- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "Thev went for what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger a

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

epose him." "Front the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it wculd seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get . . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e.. the much la

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. -They went for what they knew they could get .. . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger

depose him: -From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Reifenberg it "cold seem the pavernment was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brace. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who repre- sented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much la

epose him:" ""From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much la

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large