Epstein Secrets

Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue' of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again. and the two partners ;cid him that the executive com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses. a

epose him." "Front the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it wculd seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get . . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e.. the much la

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnow/ and Einbender again, and the two punnets told hint that the menthe com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness- over expenses. and

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the paemment was Pk:titans a bee hat:- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "Thev went for what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger a

- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- eon. On March R Epstein said he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the matabet corn- miner had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

depose him: -From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Reifenberg it "cold seem the pavernment was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brace. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, and

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who repre- sented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much la

stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin David- son. On March 9. Epstein said. he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive com- mittee had weighed the offense. together with previous "carelessness" over expenses, a

epose him:" ""From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much la

n Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over expenses, and h

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large