Epstein Secrets

According to Epstein, Bear Stearns management had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

ording to Epstein. Bear Stearns man- agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners. Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue' of the matter was Marvin David- son. On Mar

epose him." "Front the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it wculd seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get . . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e.. the much la

cording to Epstein. Bear Steams man- agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners. Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and molten 2003 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE Alvin Einbentler.ln his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the paemment was Pk:titans a bee hat:- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "Thev went for what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger a

agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners. Epstein Q: Sir, • re you a f rumors may sard9litia20Illkael (Mickey) Tarnopol andr in7S M ar ainAl— • Q. Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was

depose him: -From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Reifenberg it "cold seem the pavernment was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brace. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

According to Epstein, Bear Stearns management had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9,

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

9 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous "carelessness" over

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who repre- sented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much la

ording to Epstein, Bear Stearns man- agement had questioned him about the loan around March 4. The questioners, Epstein said, were Michael (Mickey) Tarnopol and u1.11r-u Inn, Alvin Einbender. In his 1989 deposition Ep- stein recalled that the partner who had made an "issue" of the matter was Marvin Dav

epose him:" ""From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much la

989 deposition Epstein recalled that the partner who had made an “issue” of the matter was Marvin Davidson. On March 9, Epstein said, he had met with Tarnopol and Einbender again, and the two partners told him that the executive committee had weighed the offense, together with previous “carelessness” over e

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large