Epstein Secrets

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky. tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll. the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5150.000. w

epose him." "Front the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it wculd seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get . . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e.. the much la

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in I981 I.A.G. received an in. vestment from Stroll of 5450.000.

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the paemment was Pk:titans a bee hat:- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "Thev went for what they knew they. could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger a

dulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuk that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. w

depose him: -From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Reifenberg it "cold seem the pavernment was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brace. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much lar

003/03/jeffrey-epstein-200303 He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large

investment in Texas oil wells. A judge decided Epstein owed him nothing. "It's a bad memory. I would rather not have ever met Jeffrey Epstein," said Michael Stroll, the retired former president of Williams Electronics and Sega Corp. "Suffice it to say I have nothing good to say about him." Among the character

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy: says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Brater. -They went for what they knew they could get .. . and that was the fraudulent promissory notes the much larger

dulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller in- vestors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics -Int, filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, whic

depose him." "From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy," says David Lewis, who repre- sented Mitchell Brater. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes (i.e., the much la

ulent brokers and lawyers. He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Wil- liams Electronics Inc.. filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an in- vestment from Stroll of 5450.000. w

epose him:" ""From the government's discovery in the main sentencing against HotTenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy.- says David Lewis. who represented Mitchell Bracer. "They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e.. the much la

003/03/jeffrey-epstein-200303 He was also not above entering into risky, tax-sheltered oil and gas deals with much smaller investors. A lawsuit that Michael Stroll, the former head of Williams Electronics Inc., filed against Epstein shows that in 1982 I.A.G. received an investment from Stroll of $450,000, which

o depose him.” “From the government’s discovery in the main sentencing against Hoffenberg it would seem the government was perhaps a bit lazy,” says David Lewis, who represented Mitchell Brater. “They went for what they knew they could get ... and that was the fraudulent promissory notes [i.e., the much large