Epstein Secrets

I lb Cir. 2003); United States'. 7illmon, 195 F.3d 640 (11* Cir. 1999); United States1 &mill, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11* Cir. 2003); United Stalest. Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Burgess, 175 F.3d j261 (11th Cir. 1999); United States' Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11* Cir. 2005);

ce 14032 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- William Kama! I [None] Use of intemet to entice 14063 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- Andres Rojas I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20040 as minor girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- Car

Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Panfll, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 2003); United States it Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Burgess,175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005);

ce minor to engage in sex activity. 04- 14063 William Kamal 1 [None] Use of intemet to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 04- 20040 Andres Rojas 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as minor girl) on Internet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- 20055 Ca

ates Pang supra, 338 3d at 1300-01 (11th Cir. 2003)." " There are approximately two dozen Eleventh Circuit cases that include a prosecution under Garrett, 190 3d 1220 (116 Cir. §2424(b), most of which involve the prototypical fact pattern. See, e.g., United States !Morton, 364 I3d 1300 (I l ° Cij. 20

ce 14032 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- William Kemal I [None] Use of intemet to entice 14063 minor to engage in sex activity. 04- Andres Rojas 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20040 as minor girl) on intemet chat service. D had sexually explicit conversation with u/c ofc. 04- Car