Epstein Secrets

ce. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2241(c); 2252 No Information 61 EFTA00226335 COURT. : C ' •. ... . FACILITY.. :FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. I Garrett, Internet Internet chat room as part of police 2422(b); 2252(a)(2); 190 F.3d 1220 (11'" Cir. 1999) Sting investigation of child porn; defendan

r error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 55 EFTA00226341 COURT . CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE ***U.S. I Hornaday, Internet Internet chat room "Loving Families" 2422(6); 392 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2004) Sting where people communicate about having sex with c

.g., U.S. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. Pipkins, es al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004 (RICO conspiracy); U.S. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 th Cir. 2 4) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge

tion about defendant's failure to testify. Showed up for meeting 59 EFTA00224193 COURT CASSAIS FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION a i emir U.S. 1 Garrett, Internet Internet chat room as part of police 2422(b); 2252(a)(2); 190 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999) Sting investigation of child porn; defendan

., U.S. I Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. ~ Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 `11 Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 336 9 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy char

., -.7 • etx : , . y • 75Pei.-7 y':5:4:::•*. : 4,-,4' ?*-LY- " WE; t ;41 • , tt Z,. , - ...r. .•ii.. -.7 .'.?4r.").7 1. e U.S. 1,. Garrett, Internet Internet chat room as part of police 2422(b); 2252(a)(2); 190 F.3d 1220 (11'h Cir. 1999) Sting investigation of child porn; defendan

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (sr Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state con

Cir. 2003); United States v. Tillmon, 195 F.3d 640 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Panfll, supra, 338 F.3d 1299 (11° Cir. 2003); United States it Garrett, 190 F.3d 1220 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Burgess,175 F.3d 1261 (11° Cir. 1999); United States v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11° Cir. 2005);

e simply by employing an intennediary to carry out his intended objective. Id. at 1287. Fact patterns similar to Murrell's exist in United States v Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11t Cir. 2004); United States v. Houston, 177 Fed. Appx. 57 (11" Cir. 2006); United States v. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193 (116 Cir. 2005