Epstein Secrets

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial a

otion is ripe for review. EFTA00204997 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09'26'2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial

otion is ripe for review. EFTA00205691 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09'26'2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial a

otion is ripe for review. EFTA00205830 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09'26'2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial

otion is ripe for review. EFTA00205844 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09'26'2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside.. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial a

otion is ripe for review. EFTA00205903 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09'26'2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

ress Currently Unknown 138. Steven Hoffenberg Address Currently Unknown 139. Michael Stroll Address Currently Unknown 140. Douglas Shoettle 243 Riverside, Dr. New York, NY 10025 141' Ghislaine Maxwell Address Currently Unknown 142 Records Custodian Amazon 143' Records Custodian Yellow Cab 144

AL 10104 FORREST HILL BLVD WELLINGTON, FL 33414 150. All witnesses that Defendants have listed on their Witness List not objected to by Plaintiff, Jane Doe. 151. All rebuttal witnesses. 152. All People on Jeffrey Epstein's Inmate Visitor Log while he was in jail. WITNESS TESTIMONY EXPECTED TO BE PRESE

me Court has interpreted "promptly" under Rule 5(b) as generally requiring that the complaint be filed within forty-eight hours of arrest. Cnty. Of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56-57 (1991). It is therefore possible that where the defendant is arrested on a weekday without a warrant, the initial

motion is ripe for review. EFTA00622793 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 99 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/26/2011 Page 2 of 14 Background' Plaintiffs Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 are alleged victims of federal sex crimes committed by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County. Between 2001 and 2007, Epstein sexua

from other ventures in 1994, Trump sold most of his interest in the project to Asian investors, who were able to finance completion of the project, Riverside South1521 Mar-a-Lago In 1985, Trump acquired the Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida ti° In 1995, he converted the estate into a private dub

d victims.M Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1(Ma) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Ili and his limited 2008 sta

22/00 Testified at trial, 9/5/00 Epps V. Preventative Security. Inc. (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Testified at trial, 8/25/00 CA v. Joseph Neale (Riverside, California) Testified at trial, 11/20/00 CA v. Rex Allan Krebs (Monterey, California) Testified at penalty phase, 05/03/01 Saunders v. City of S

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at

No If "no, " skip to Question C. If "yes," answer Question B. 1, at right. B.2. Do 50% or more of the defendants who reside in the district reside in Riverside and/or San Bernardino Counties? (Consider the two counties together.) check one of the boxes to the right Southern Eastern YES. Your case will initia

y 23 massage while he was completely naked. The Defendant, Donald J. Trump, was also present as he 24 was getting his own massage from another minor, Jane Doe, age 13. Defendant Epstein forced 25 Plaintiff Johnson to touch his erect penis by physically placing her bare hands upon his sex organ 26 and again