Epstein Secrets

emption 7(E) generally covers only "investigatory records that disclose investigative techniques and procedures not generally known to the public," Doherty v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 775 F.2d 49, 52 n.4 (2d Cir. 1985), "even commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure could

enuinely harm the government's case in an enforcement proceeding or impede an investigation." North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088, 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (R.B. Ginsburg, J.).3 A. The Records Were Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes 3 Exemption 7(A) also protects records that, if released, could interfere with pos

d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U.S. Drug Enf 't Admin., 878 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2017) 19 EFTA00071556 Case 1:2

enuinely harm the government's case in an enforcement proceeding or impede an investigation." North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088, 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (R.B. Ginsburg, J.).3 ii The Records Were Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes As a threshold matter, all of the documents withheld by BOP were "compiled for law

d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U.S. Drug Enf 't Admin., 878 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2017) 19 EFTA00075439 Case 1:2

enuinely harm the government's case in an enforcement proceeding or impede an investigation." North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088, 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (R.B. Ginsburg, J.).3 ii The Records Were Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes As a threshold matter, all of the documents withheld by BOP were "compiled for law

d 64 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 8 Cut for Nall Sec. Studies v. U.S. Dept of Justice, 331 F.3d 918 (D.C. Cir. 2003) 8 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487(1994) 18 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 Eil v. U.S. Drug Enf 't Admin., 878 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2017) 19 EFTA00088673 Case 1:2

enuinely harm the government's case in an enforcement proceeding or impede an investigation." North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088, 1097 (D.C. Cir. 1989) (R.B. Ginsburg, J.).3 ii The Records Were Compiled for Law Enforcement Purposes As a threshold matter, all of the documents withheld by BOP were "compiled for law