3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
4 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 5 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'n, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 17 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 12, 14 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 DOJ v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) 13 Ell v. U.S. Dru
xemption 7(E) generally covers only "investigatory records that disclose investigative techniques and procedures not generally known to the public," Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49, 52 n.4 (2d Cir. 1985), "even commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure co
iii EFTA00071587 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 5 of 25 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This case involves records at the core of FOIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of
4 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 5 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'n, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 17 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 12, 14 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 DOJ v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) 13 Ell v. U.S. Dru
xemption 7(E) generally covers only "investigatory records that disclose investigative techniques and procedures not generally known to the public," Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49, 52 n.4 (2d Cir. 1985), "even commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure co
iii EFTA00088608 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 5 of 25 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This case involves records at the core of FOIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of
4 (D.C. Cir. 1986) 5 Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'n, 532 U.S. 1 (2001) 17 DOD v. FLRA, 510 U.S. 487 (1994) 12, 14 Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49 (2d Cir. 1985) 20 DOJ v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) 13 Ell v. U.S. Dru
xemption 7(E) generally covers only "investigatory records that disclose investigative techniques and procedures not generally known to the public," Doherty v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 775 F.2d 49, 52 n.4 (2d Cir. 1985), "even commonly known procedures may be protected from disclosure if the disclosure co
iii EFTA00099601 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 5 of 25 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This case involves records at the core of FOIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of
Entities connected to both Doherty and FOIA Exemption

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATIONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATIONNicholas Tartaglione
PERSONChristenson
PERSON
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
ORGANIZATIONGarcia
PERSON
Audrey Strauss
PERSONRobbins Tire & Rubber Co.
ORGANIZATIONthe Acting United States
ORGANIZATION
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION
Human Rights Watch
ORGANIZATION
Hopkins
ORGANIZATIONRadcliffe
PERSONJudicial Watch, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONFavish
PERSOND.C. Cir
ORGANIZATIONTova Noel
PERSON