3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
is likely that both overt and covert sexual grooming behaviors are more easily identified retrospectively, rather than prospectively, as proposed by Craven and colleagues (2006). Once identified, people may be outraged at how the sexual offender was not 3502-018 Page 8 of 11 EFTA_00001498 EFTA001568
members will be able to detect grooming behaviors that occur before the abuse in cases of intrafamilial and professional child abuse. Additionally, Craven and colleagues (2006) proposed that identifying grooming behaviors is CONTACT Georgia M. Winters G gwIntersegay.cuny.edu O Psydiology Department, Jo
0). This step is often regarded as the central role of the grooming process, wherein the offender establishes trust and cooperation with the victim (Salter 1995; van Dam 2001). The offender accomplishes this by befriending the child, by learning about his/her interests, being helpful, showering the chi
ing of Children: Review of Literature and Theoretical Considerations? The Journal of Sexual Aggression 12 (3):287-99. doh 10.1080113552600601069414 Craven. Samantha. Sarah Brown.and Elizabeth Gilchrist. 2007. 'Current Responses to Sexual Grooming Implication for Prevention." The Howard Journal of Crimi
al grooming in past literature (See Table 1), none of which have ultimately been widely accepted. Table 1. Definitions of Sexual Grooming. Source Salter (19951 Definitions of Sexual Grooming Howitt (1995) Leberg (1997) Gallagher (1999) McAlinden (20071 Brackenridge (20011 Gillespie (2002) Spie
g access to a victim, prior models describe a stage in which the offender works toward deceptively developing trust and cooperation with the child (Craven et aL, 2006; Leclerc et at, 2009; Olson et al., 2007). While some models incorporate a broad stage that refers to the overarching goal of trust dev
child they love them or the child is special (Lang & Frenzel, 1988), giving the child bribes or rewards (e.g., Lang & Frenzel, 1988; Lawson, 2003; Salter, 1995; Shakeshaft, 2004), or enforcing or withholding punishment (Lawson, 2003). While Winters and Jeglic (2017) SGM addresses the limitations of p
Entities connected to both Craven and Salter

George W. Bush
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSON
David Rodgers
PERSONChristiansen
ORGANIZATION
Berlin
LOCATION
Routledge
ORGANIZATION
Conte
PERSONMcAlinden
PERSONElliott
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONBlake
PERSON
Gordon Brown
PERSONGillespie
PERSON