Epstein Secrets

evant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 00101 07/09/2009 Bradley Edwards Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

edes C. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 0

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calcu

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

evant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 00101 07/09/2009 Bradley Edwards Mike Fisten Litigation Strategy Work Product;attorney client privilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evid

. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege e er r m Bob Critton 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege Letter from Bob Critton 02054 05/12/2009 Spence

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calcu

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

t name is 8 Fisten. 9 Q. All right. What's his first name, the one 10 you know? 11 A. Mike. 12 Q. Michael Fisten? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. Mike Fisten ever do any work for you when 15 you worked as a solo practitioner at any time prior 1.6 to you joining RRA? 17 A. No. 18 Q. Did you know o

ting 21 Agency. 22 Will counsel please introduce 23 yourselves, and then the court reporter 24 will swear in the witnesses. 25 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of the PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. EFTA00599665 Page 5 Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein. MR. GOLDBERG: Jack Goldberger on behalf of