8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
8 / 9
Mentions
or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Roths
stina ICitterman k. Dean Kretschmar 1. Michael Legamaro 16. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, M. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitation into the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 17. Any employment agreemen
oquialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff means =. (MI. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280S1XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA0280S8XXXXIVIB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case
or Epstein (wire taps, bugs, other listening and watching)? 21.9.6 What is Blue Line R & D? 21.10 Knowledge of skills and involvement of: 21.10.1 Mike Fisten 21.10.2 Ken Jenne 21.10.3 Patrick 21.10.4 Rick Fandry 22. Criminal History - have you ever been convicted of a crime? If yes, when and for what
Paul Cassell? If yes, since when and how did you meet? 14.10 A Mr. Howell? same as for Cassell. 14.11 3 files: State court was ■. (Jane Doe # 2), E.W. (Jane Doe #1) and . 14.12 Who staffed the Epstein files? 14.12.1 BE testified that you Judge Stone, Bill Berger and Rob Buschell worked on cases?
or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 3. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Roths
as g. Andrew Barnett 9 EFTA00722468 h. Bradley Edwards 15. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe,. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitatio the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 16. Any employment agreements or
y or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (Including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All emalls, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwa
quialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #
or representative of RRA and any Investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 3. All e-mails, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Scott W. Roths
oc 1063 Filed 10/13/10 Page 7 of 8 h. Bradley Edwards 15. All documents related to or referencing potential deponents in the Jane Doe, L.M. or E.W., cases used in connection with Investor meetings and/or general Investor solicitation into the Rothstein Ponzi Scheme. 16. Any employment agreemen
ny, did Ghislaine Maxwell have to [your three clients]? MR. SCAROLA: Objection, work product. Instruct you not to answer. Id. at 155.6 Q. Who did [Mike Fisten] go to California to interview? MR. SCAROLA: That is work product and I instruct you not to answer. Id. at 170. Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview a per
answer the threshold "yes" or "no" question: Did [Mr. Howell] ever relate that to you." Id. 9. Edwards in one instance when asked what his client E.W. told him on the phone, himself claimed privilege. Id. at 90. Later, when asked "for what purpose did Ms. L.M. originally hire you?," his attorney o
y or representative of RRA and any investor or third party (person or entity) regarding Jeffrey Epstein or which mentions Jeffrey Epstein (including Mike Fisten, Kenneth Jenne, Patrick Roberts or Rick (Rich) Fandrey). 4. All emalls, data, correspondence, memos, or similar documents between Bradley J. Edwa
uialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051,OOO(MB), E.W. (EVV. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058)OOOO48), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case
irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01973-01974 07/23/2009 Mike Fisten Bradley J. Edwards CMA vs. Epstein — new investigator info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calcu
ed to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 07025-07027 10/29/2009 Bradley Edwards Paul Cassell ■. and E.W. v. Epstein — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide
Entities connected to both Mike Fisten and E.W.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONRobert D. Critton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Weissing
PERSONJaffe
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Jay Howell
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSONSpencer Kuvin
PERSON