Epstein Secrets

lling 42:16 Rolodex 174:15 185:3 romantic 13:3 Rome 200:8 Ron 94:18 160:10 room 2:15 17:12 32:21 76:21 139:15 141:16 Rosa 129:25 131:17 Rosa's 129:25 Rosenfeldt 166:22 Rosovsky 100:19 102:17 Rothschild 72:24 Rothstein 166:22,22 168:21 176:1,2,2 Rothstein's 168:19 170:15 171:1 royal 101:4 129:8 130:19 130:22 1

never -- I don't Page 199 1 have any recollection of seeing Mark Middleton at the 2 island. 3 TODD BLANCHE: How about former US Senator 4 George Mitchell? 5 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Yeah, I do remember 6 George. 7 TODD BLANCHE: What do you remember about 8 him? 9 GHISLAINE

You became friends with 19 Heather? 20 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Heather, yes. 21 TODD BLANCHE: Was Mr. Epstein friends 22 with, Mr. Mitchell? 23 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: Yes. 24 TODD BLANCHE: Did they travel together 25 besides New York? Did they travel to the island or

ether 25 besides New York? Did they travel to the island or Page 200 1 to New Mexico? 2 GHISLAINE MAXWELL: I don't -- I don't 3 remember George ever at the island. But the most 4 memorable trip I do recall with Senator was to Italy. 5 TODD BLANCHE: Was to where? 6 GHIS

e there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein. The deposition of Scott Rothstein was taken in the bankruptcy proceeding of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler ("RRA"), but not completed, from December 12, 2011 through December 7 EFTA00808032 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA0

.g., Levin, Middlebrooks, Mahie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 616, 608

pon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm. Rothstein himself admitte

Ia. 3d DCA 2011) 3 Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 19

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

ve the letters that 20 chat is that those exhibits were listed for the 21 confirm the written agreement with every detail of 21 first time in Mitch, which would have been three 22 that agreement in place -- those wore turned over 22 days ago, and discussed perhaps within the last few 23 as

21:2028:19 50:18 52:2,3,23 55:3 67:11,13,17 67:21 68:4,8,16 69:14 70:6,15,24 78:5 79:2,8,19 84:11 85:10,22 87:12 89:3,6,13 89:15 Room 1:15 Rosenfeldt 32:10 Roth 6:4 Rothstein 1:8 7:7,11 7:12 9:17 13:25 22:17 23:2,5,17 23:23 24:11,12,22 25:5,24 26:10,19 26:23 27:6 31:6 31:10,24 32:10,15 32:

y, Hr. Scarola can notice his case for 10 of the Air& circumstances, and of quote. 10 trial and you can set it for 30, and we will 19 MR. LINK: Mitch moans if you limit it, 19 be here to try the case, and wo won't seek a 20 that prejudice is gone. That's what he's 20 continuance. 21 tolling

client .• II variety of cases. It wan the entire contents of It So it was obvious that whet wes to happen at Ix the e-mail server of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, 12 that point was they were to take over the 17 and it was recognized that those e- could 13 ninisteriol task es officers of the cour

ve the letters that 20 chat is that those exhibits were listed for the 21 confirm the written agreement with every detail of 21 first time in Mitch, which would have been three 22 that agreement in place -- those wore turned over 22 days ago, and discussed perhaps within the last few 23 as

4) fraud. Epstein's complaint set forth details of a Pont scheme that Edwards, Rothstein, and others perpetrated through their law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). (It 1-36).' The scheme included fraudulent promises to investors of multi-million dollar recoveries against Epstein from v

d also finding that Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 1994)

Rosenfeldt-14 RRA partners still under investigation Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:44:40 +0000 Friday, July 2, 2010 I Modified: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 Rosenfeldt asked about sex parties South Florida Business Journal - by Paul Brinkmann Stuart Rosenfeldt, former law firm partner of Ponzi schemer Scott Rothst

was accompanied by three of his attorneys — Lehr, Mitchell Fuerst and Luis Salazar. During a break, Lichtman

pon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm. Rothstein himself admitte

Ia. 3d DCA 2011) 3 Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606 (Fla

pon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown partners of theirs at Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler, engaged in serious misconduct involving a widely publicized illegal Ponzi scheme operated through their law firm. Rothstein himself admitte

Ia. 3d DCA 2011) 3 Levin, Middlebrooks, Moves & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606 (Fla