Epstein Secrets

rts, Evaluation and Inspections Report 16-05 (June 2016). 96 EFTA00039127 management failures at multiple levels within the BOP.,' Similar to the Bulger report, the numerous and serious transgressions that occurred in this matter came to light largely because they involved a high-profile inmate. The

assign Epstein a new cellmate, and that he likely notified an unspecified Lieutenant. However, the OIG did not credit the Day Watch SHU Officer in Charge's account because no other witnesses or evidence confirmed that he had in fact passed on information regarding Epstein's need for a new cellmate, ei

Release EFTA00172639 Limited Official Use Only—Not for Public Release and management failures at multiple levels within the BOP.53 Similar to the Bulger report, the numerous and serious transgressions that occurred in this matter came to light largely because they involved a high- profile inmate. The

e superior (the Day Watch SHU Officer in Charge) was already aware of the need to assign Epstein a new cellmate. While the Day Watch SHU Officer in Charge told the OIG that he made a number of notifications, other witnesses could not confirm that he had passed on information regarding Epstein's need fo

ion Efforts, Evaluation and Inspections Report 16-05 (June 2016). 97 management failures at multiple levels within the BOP.57 Similar to the Bulger report, the numerous and serious transgressions that occurred in this matter came to light largely because they involved a high-profile inmate. Th

assign Epstein a new cellmate, and that he likely notified an unspecified Lieutenant. However, the OIG did not credit the Day Watch SHU Officer in Charge’s account because no other witnesses or evidence confirmed that he had in fact passed on information regarding Epstein’s need for a new cellmate, ei

rts, Evaluation and Inspections Report 16-05 (June 2016). 96 EFTA01656810 management failures at multiple levels within the BOP.,' Similar to the Bulger report, the numerous and serious transgressions that occurred in this matter came to light largely because they involved a high-profile inmate. The

assign Epstein a new cellmate, and that he likely notified an unspecified Lieutenant. However, the OIG did not credit the Day Watch SHU Officer in Charge's account because no other witnesses or evidence confirmed that he had in fact passed on information regarding Epstein's need for a new cellmate, ei