Epstein Secrets

Xl) & (a)(5XB); 2256; 1512(bX1)& (b)(2XA) No Information 85 EFTA00224219 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE E.D. Ky. U.S. I Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sling 55 EFTA00224189 COURTIIIIIIIIIIIII .11-Mr . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION , a CHARGE11.„ U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 l'a Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

nd guilty & Bled motion for judgment of acquittal and/or new trial, which was denied. 2252(a)(4)(B); 2422(6) No Information • E.D. Ky. U.S. v. Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

ound guilty & filed motion for judgment of acquittal and/or new trial, which was denied. 2252(a)(4)(B); 2422(b) No Information E.D. Ky. U.S. v. Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

nsummated Showed up for meeting Stint, Sentenced to 78 months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 1th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

4 Not Consummated 87 EFTA00226309 . COURT • . CASES +'' ,. • • • rFACILITY; xeNearstco icknoN . , . .. CHARGE.iS ..• E.D. Ky. U.S. I Kimberly, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27955 (E.D. Ky. 2005) Internet Defendant met 15 yr-old on the Internet; solicited sex from her on the Internet; arranged

5,000 fine, $86 restitution & $300 special assessment. Affirmed. 57 EFTA00226339 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION. CIIARGE.S U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica