Epstein Secrets

led himself of the benefits and protections of the EFTA00310011 DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS &stein. et at v. Falwell' Paneling. Inc. Page laws of the forum state." Burger King Corp., 471 U.S. at 474-476. The purposeful availment requirement "ensures that a defend

h other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. alb Dated this /1, th day of March, 2011. Respectfully s Treston E V.I. Bar 10 MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant 5035 Noire Gad; P.O. Box 310 St. Thomas, VI 00804-0310 PHONE: FAX: EMAIL: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certif

inst Defendant for failure to correct the multitude of 27 EFTA00309207 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Epstein et al. it Falwell' Paneling. Inc. Case No. ST-I0-CV-443 defects in and to properly and fully complete the fabrication, installation, staining and finishing of the L

aused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this 11'" day of February, 2011. bb K1/4 BRAD. 4 C( 30 EFTA003

ly chose not to do so. That they 3 EFTA00308341 Plaintif/i• Opposition to Defendant's Motion For Leave to File Amended Reply Epstein et al. vs. Falwell, Paneling, Inc. Case No. ST-10-CV-443 subsequently choose to do so now in violation of the rules of the Court should not be countenanced. II. DE

of the foregoing Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File An Amended Reply Brief to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this ,Qcrt- day of ?-La r rU. , 2011. PnottshIGA Anna_ It-t