Epstein Secrets

the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in =MDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, =e can't create dis

alue (via the buy-back or some similar means) we =ould have to write-off our investment of $2,487,500. This would be =ompletely unacceptable to the Informa Board (Peter and Adam), so they =on't approve the deal. The only way to make this work is if Informa receives $2,487,500 in =xchange for its shares, and w

the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in =MDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, =e can't create dis

alue (via the buy-back or some similar means) we =ould have to write-off our investment of $2,487,500. This would be =ompletely unacceptable to the Informa Board (Peter and Adam), so they =on't approve the deal. The only way to make this work is if Informa receives $2,487,500 in =xchange for its shares, and w

the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should get their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in CMDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, we can't create di

alue (via the buy-back or some similar means) we would have to write- off our investment of $2,487,500. This would be completely unacceptable to the Informa Board (Peter and Adam), so they won't approve the deal. The only way to make this work is if Informa receives $2,487,500 in exchange for its shares, and