4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in =MDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, =e can't create dis
David Stern Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:02 PM To: Jeffrey epstein Subject: Re: The problem as stated by the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's prop
the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in =MDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, =e can't create dis
David Stern Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:02 PM To: Jeffrey epstein Subject: Re: The problem as stated by the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should =et their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's prop
the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should get their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in CMDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, we can't create di
n[[email protected]] From: David Stern Sent: Wed 1/11/2012 3:02:09 PM Subject: Re: The problem as stated by the other side. Note: CMDS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should get their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's prop
the other side. Note: CMOS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should get their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's proposed treatment in CMDS of the fee for the grant of the licence, as income. Without that, we can't create dis
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 3:02:09 PM To: Jeffrey epstein <[email protected]> The problem as stated by the other side. Note: CMOS is the Holding Co of which I currently own 49.9% and should get their 50.1% as part of the deal (to make it 100% mine) Deloitte's are refusing to support Informa's prop
Entities connected to both Deloitte and the Holding Co of