Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00090721

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

is not "manifestly clear" that evidence is proof of the charged conspiracies, "the proper course is to proceed under Rule 4O4(b)." United States v. Townsend, No. SI 06 CR. 34 (JFK), 2007 WL 1288597, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2007) (citing United States v. Nektalov, 325 F. Supp. 2d 367, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2004))

51 F.2d 477 (2d Cir.1984) 41 Smalls, No. CR 06-2403 RB, 2008 WL 11361098 (D.N.M. Jan. 24, 2008) 3 Stein, 521 F. Supp. 2d 266 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 38 Townsend, No. Si 06 CR. 34 (JFK), 2007 WL 1288597 (S.D.N.Y. May I, 2007) 29, 36 Tracy, 12 F.3d 1186 (2d Cir.1993) 5 Velez, No. 3:10CR147 JBA, 2010 WL 49

ein intended to engage in sexual contact with her. See id. It is the government. not the defense, that apparently does not understand the law. The Mann Act conspiracies charged in the S2 Indictment each require proof that Ms. Maxwell acted with the intent that the alleged victim would "engage in sexual

EFTA00074479

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

6, 8, 9, 10 United States v. Pascarella, 84 F.3d 61 (2d Cir. 1996) 11 United States v. Sliker, 751 F.2d 477 (2d Cir. 1984) 12 United States v. Townsend, No. S1 06 CR. 34 (JFK), 2007 WL 1288597 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2007) 6, 9, 10 United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. J

United States v. Walla, No. 14—CR-213 (MKB), 2014 WL 3734522 (S.D.N.Y. July 25, 2014) 12 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 7 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 7 Mann Act passim Other Authorities Fed. R. Evid. 401 12 Fed. R. Evid. 402 11, 12 Fed. R. Evid. 403 passim Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) passim Fed. R. Evid

EFTA00087774

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page