Epstein Secrets

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (1) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

telephone numbers and rates of pay for all em- ployers for which you worked, including the ilt) 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx7sv=Split&prft=HTMLEScifm=NotSet&mt... 3/26/2009 EFTA00221704 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 67-

nition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the re- quested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (I) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat.

re. In addition, any testimony or evidence or any information produced by the plaintiff or wit- 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Split&prft=1.ITMLE&ifm-NotSet&mt... 3/26/2009 EFTA00222136 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 68

e attorneys of the United States in their control over criminal prosecutions." 819 F2d at 1312 (internal quotation omitted); see also taRoucht v. Webster, 666 F$upp. 415, 417 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (holding that the separa- tion of powers prevents courts from interfer- ing in federal criminal investigations e

available and adequate remedy at law. Specifically, he may assert his present claims as well as any O 2007 Thomson/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sr=Full&prft=HTMLE&mt=FederalGo... 12/27/2007 EFTA00191809 Page 2 of 2 Not Reported in F.Supp.2