Epstein Secrets

arly described as: Lauderdale Shores Rcamcm Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW 14th Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP I 0," includes that portion of the condominiumitownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

arly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW 141h Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP 10," includes that portion of the condominiumftownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments a

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and ■.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to th

e particularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Plat Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 ? le Street, Apt. 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as T or ' fend t RHO," includes that portion of the condominium/townhome, vements, fixtures, attachments and

Epstein as well as the improper litigation tactics outlined above) occurred within a five-year time period. 58. As a direct and proximate result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s violations of §772.103, Fla. Stat., EPSTEIN has been injured. 59. Pursuant to §772.104(1), Fla. Stat., Plaintiff EPSTEIN is entitled to

icularly described as: Lauderdale Shores Reamem Nat 15-31 B Lot 22 Blk 5 with a Folio Number of 5042 12 13 0380; (RP10)10630 NW le Street, Apt 110, Plantation, Florida, hereafter also referred to as "Defendant RP10," includes that portion of the condominiumltownhome, improvements, fixtures, attachments an

TEIN, EDWARDS and L.M. possessed ulterior motives or purposes in exercising such illegal, improper, or perverted use of process. 72. As a result of ROTHSTEIN, EDWARDS and L.M.'s actions, EPSTEIN suffered damages. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff EPSTEIN respectfully demands the entry of a judgment for damages against all th