Epstein Secrets

able and inapposite to the instant case, and as such its narrow holding has no bearing on, and should not be considered by, this Court. Similarly, Appellant cites Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) in support of his assertion that the litigation privilege is inapplicable to a malicious

his assertion that the litigation privilege is inapplicable to a malicious prosecution claim. However, such reliance thereupon is misplaced. First, Appellant's characterization of Levin as impliedly approving the survival of a malicious prosecution claim in the Wright case is completely unfounded. In Levi

that a copy was electronically served to the following on February 25, 2015: William B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. 3409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Mark Nurik Law Offices of Mark S

414 (Fla. 2012). STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In December 2009, Appellee, Jeffrey Epstein, filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Appellant, Bradley J. Edwards, based upon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown part

Y that a copy was electronically served to the following on February , 2015: William B. King Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Bradley J. Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderda

Judgment motion that Appellant could not satisfy all of the elements of a Malicious Prosecution claim, including that the suit by Appellee against Appellant resulted in a bona-fide termination in favor of Appellant. Appellee took a voluntary dismissal without prejudice, which does not constitute a bona-

37 315 S.E. 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 8 EFTA00808566 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldberger, Es Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 3

Appeal from a Non-Final Order of the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida Joe Titone Attorney for Appellant Florida Bar No. 203882 62 1SE 5th Street Pompano Beach, FL 33060 Phone: (954)729-6490 [email protected] 1 EFTA00792289 TABLE OF CONTE

Y CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served by electronic mail to the Appellant's counsel: LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA Counsel for Appellant 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 847-4408 telephone (561) 855-2891 facsimile Kara Berard Rockenbach, Esq. PE: Scott J. Link Es . PE

414 (Fla. 2012). STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS In December 2009, Appellee, Jeffrey Epstein, filed suit against Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein") and Appellant, Bradley J. Edwards, based upon Epstein's justifiable belief at the time of filing his Complaint that these two individuals, and other unknown part

IFY that a copy was electronically served to the following on February 25, 2015: William B. King Searcy Dennylcarola Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Bradley J. Edwards Fanner, Jaffe, Weissin Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, M. 425 N. Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale.

inst appellant and had the summons served upon appellant on the day he arrived at appellee's offices to participate in settlement negotiations. Id. Appellant moved to quash the service and the trial court denied the motion. The Third District, however, agreed that said service "was occasioned by fraud an

Botja, Esquire WILEY REIN LLP 1776 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Jack Scarola, Esquire Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. TONJA HADDAD, PA 315 SE 7th Street Suite 301 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 10 Tonja Ha