Epstein Secrets

an Dershowitz, Esq. November 19, 2007 Page 14 interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").' Under these standards, the

es not mean that he is knowingly seeking to persuade or induce someone to engage in activity that would constitute a crime. See Richard A. Posner & Katharine B. Silbaug, A Guide to America's ex Laws 44 (Univ. of Chi. Press 1998). Accordingly, to violate § 2422(b), an actor must know that he is trying to persuade no

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland v, United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there i

es not mean that he is knowingly seeking to persuade or induce someone to engage in activity that would constitute a crime. See Richard A. Posner & Katharine B. Silbaug, A Guide to America's Sex Laws 44 (Univ. of Chi. Press 1998). Accordingly, to violate § 2422(b), an actor must know that he is trying to persuade n

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there is

es not mean that he is knowingly seeking to persuade or induce someone to engage in activity that would constitute a crime. See Richard A. Posner & Katharine B. Silbaug, A Guide to America's Sex Laws 44 (Univ. of Chi. Press 1998). Accordingly, to violate § 2422(b), an actor must know that he is trying to persuade n

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland I, United States 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there

es not mean that he is knowingly seeking to persuade or induce someone to engage in activity that would constitute a crime. See Richard A. Posner & Katharine B. Silbaug A Guide to America's Sex Laws 44 (Univ. of Chi. Press 1998). Accordingly, to violate § 2422(b), an actor must know that he is trying to persuade no

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive." ).r Under these standards, the

es not mean that he is knoWingly seeking to persuade or induce someone to engage in activity that would constitute a crime. See Richard A. Posner & Katharine B. Silbaug, A Guide to Americas Sex Laws 44 (Univ. of Chi. Press 1998). Accordingly, to violate § 2422(b), an actor must know that he is trying to persuade no