Epstein Secrets

an Dershowitz, Esq. November 19, 2007 Page 14 interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").' Under these standards, the

o meet somewhere, called a young person on the phone, and/or sent the young person correspondence, money, or gifts through the U.S. Postal Service. See Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Dep't of Justice, OVC Bulletin. "Internet Crimes Against Children" (3d prtg. 2005). Unfortunately, computers and the intemet had facilitated

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland v, United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there i

o meet somewhere, called a young person on the phone, and/or sent the young person correspondence, money, or gifts through the U.S. Postal Service. See Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Dept of Justice OVC Bulletin, "Internet crinflingt Children" (3d png. 2005). Unfortunately, computers and the intemet had facilitated sexual

t be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement") (emphasis added)• Cleveland United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there is

o meet somewhere, called a young person on the phone, and/or sent the young person correspondence, money, or gifts through the U.S. Postal Service. See Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Dept of Justice OVC Bulletin, "Internet crinflinst Children" (3d prig. 2005). Unfortunately, computers and the intemet had facilitated sexua

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland I, United States 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive.").2 Under these standards, there

o meet somewhere, called a young person on the phone, and/or sent the young person correspondence, money, or gifts through the U.S. Postal Service. See Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Dep't of Justice, QVC Bulletin, "Internet Crimes Against Children" (3d prtg. 2005). Unfortunately, computers and the intemet had facilitated

be found to exist before the conclusion of the interstate journey and must be the dominant motive of such interstate movement.") (emphasis added); Cleveland v. United States, 329 U.S. 14, 20 (1946) ("There was evidence ... that the unlawful purpose was the dominant motive." ).r Under these standards, the

o meet somewhere, called a young person on the phone, and/or sent the young person correspondence, money, or gifts through the U.S. Postal Service. See Office for Victims of Crime, U.S. Dep't of Justice, OVC Bulletin, "Internet Crimes Against Children" (3d prtg. 2005). Unfortunately, computers and the intemet had facilitated