Epstein Secrets

ted States v. John Doe Inc. I, 481 U.S. 102, 109 n.5 (1987); United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983); Lance v. United States Dep't of Justice (In re Grand Jury Investigation), 610 F.2d 202, 213 (5th Cir. 1980). A ruling unsealing the non-prosecution agreement and addendum would not disclo

court. At the outset of the June 12, 2009 hearing on Mr. Epstein's renewed motion to stay the civil cases pending in front of federal Judge Marra, Jane Doe's attorney, Brad Edwards, also counsel for respondent E.W., advised Judge Marra that he had filed the non-prosecution agreement "under seal in your c

Brad Edwards, also counsel for respondent E.W., advised Judge Marra that he had filed the non-prosecution agreement "under seal in your court" in "Jane Doe 1 and 2 vs. United States of America" (EWA at 5). Mr. Epstein's counsel advised Judge Colbath of Mr. Edwards' sealed filing in federal court at the J

V-MARRAMOHNSON EFTA00208059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04107/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

FLSD Docket 04:07)2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH

s been filed." 23 EFTA00078857 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF TH