Epstein Secrets

ell with sex trafficking offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (Counts Five and Six) and has dramatically expanded the timeframe of the Mann Act 2 Ex. A (Dep't of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of its 2006-

ive and Six Allege the Same Offenses that Were Part of the Florida Investigation and Are Covered by the Plain Terms of the NPA 6 B. The NPA Binds the Southern District of New York as to Counts Five and Six. 11 C. Counts One and Three Must Also Be Dismissed 17 II. Prosecuting Ms. Maxwell on Counts Five and S

V-MARRAMOHNSON EFTA00208059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04107/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

iscretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). In this case, that officer was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and he exercised his discretion by deferring prosecution in favor of prosecution by authorities of the State of Florida. Thus, no feder

District of Florida Alex 'Indictment, United States v. Epstein, No. 19 Crim. 490 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2019), ECF No. 2. 2 Id. at I. 3 Press Release, Dep't of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office, S.D.N.Y., Jeffrey Epstein Charged In Manhattan Federal Court With Sex Trafficking Of Minors: Alleged Conduct Occurred in bo

ters related to his case in order to ensure and maintain the integrity of the criminal proceedings. On Monday, July 8, 2019, federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York unsealed an indictment charging Jeffrey Epstein with the sex trafficking of minors.' Prosecutors assert that between 2002 and 2005, Eps

s been filed." 23 EFTA00078857 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to

iscretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6). In this case, that officer was the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and he exercised his discretion by deferring prosecution in favor of prosecution by authorities of the State of Florida. Thus, no feder