4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
Entities connected to both the New York State Supreme Court and The U.S. Pretrial Services Department

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSON
New York City
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
United States
LOCATION
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION
Palm Beach
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Mark Epstein
PERSON
James Baker
PERSON
Dominguez
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
George Mitchell
PERSON
New York State
LOCATIONMartir
PERSONValerio
PERSON