Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." paulino 335 F. Supp. at 610. At the outset, it should be noted that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, concludes that: "The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance for the following reasons: 1. [Mr. Epstein's] Extensive foreign
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." paulino 335 F. Supp. at 610. At the outset, it should be noted that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, concludes that: "The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance for the following reasons: 1. [Mr. Epstein's] Extensive foreign
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." paulino 335 F. Supp. at 610. At the outset, it should be noted that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, concludes that: "The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance for the following reasons: 1. [Mr. Epstein's] Extensive foreign
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 20 of 33 was unanimously affirmed, on November 17, 2011, by a panel of five judges of the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court. People v. Epstein, 89 A.D.3d 570, 933 N.Y.S.2d 239 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). Notwithstanding Judge Pickholz's order, according to a July 10, 2019 inv
under section 3142(g) is within the 'special province' of the district court." paulino 335 F. Supp. at 610. At the outset, it should be noted that the Pretrial Services Report, dated July 12, 2019, concludes that: "The defendant poses a risk of nonappearance for the following reasons: 1. [Mr. Epstein's] Extensive foreign
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (92)
Entities connected to both the New York State Supreme Court and the Pretrial Services Report
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ the·7 w/ the
United Kingdom
LOCATION7 w/ the·7 w/ the
United States
LOCATION7 w/ the·7 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·7 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ the·5 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON6 w/ the·7 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION8 w/ the·4 w/ the
Oliver Stone
PERSON8 w/ the·4 w/ the
MA
Martir
PERSON6 w/ the·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·7 w/ the
Contreras
PERSON6 w/ the·5 w/ the
Larry Celona
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·4 w/ the
Palm Beach
LOCATION6 w/ the·4 w/ the
Mark Epstein
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the
James Baker
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the
Singh
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the
GO
Goodwin
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ the