Epstein Secrets

iewed as a form of injunctive relief, is more precisely viewed as a pre- judgment seizure of property. In any event, the name is not important. See Rosen v. Cascade Intern., Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1530 (11th Cir. 1994) (“federal courts look past the terminology to the actual nature of the relief request

e Doe’s argument that “equity will do what ought to be done.” Jane Doe’s Motion to Restrain Fraudulent Transfer of Assets at 17 (citing Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000)). The only question then is “what ought to be done?” Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on

determine the availability of prejudgment remedies for the seizure of person or property to secure satisfaction of the judgment ultimately entered." Rosen v. Cascade Intern., Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1531 (11th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, under this Rule, this Court looks to Florida law to determine Jane Doe'

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe

determine the availability of prejudgment remedies for the seizure of person or property to secure satisfaction of the judgment ultimately entered." Rosen v. Cascade Intern., Inc., 21 F.3d 1520, 1531 (11th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, under this Rule, this Court looks to Florida law to determine Jane Doe'

7 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe