Epstein Secrets

ature of the attendant at birth, that challenge goes to the weight of the evid- ence, not its admissibility on grounds of authenti- city. See, e.g., Doyle, 130 F.3d at 545 ("(T)he offi- cial does not need to attest to the truth or trustwor- thiness of the facts contained in the document; ac- curacy of i

t 756. In Hicks, we extended that reasoning to § 2423(b)'s prohibition of travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct. 457 F.3d at 841. Helder and Hicks control here, and apply with equal force to the third statute under which Spurlock was convicted: attempt to know- ingly transfer obscen

tual minor must be involved, the govern- ment proved no violation of federal law. This argument is foreclosed by our deci- sions in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir.2006), and United States v. Hicks, 457 FM 838 (8th Cir2006). In Heftier, we concluded that an actual minor victim is not r

4212 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION di, CHARGE'S ED. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 (E.D. Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (ED. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to be a 16 yr-old gay teen approached a "15 yr-old male teen" on the

d no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet No information available. Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 2422(b) Sting 38874 (W.D. Mo

inor; indictment need not specify the sexual conduct upon which it is based. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Sin U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1 1429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet No information available but appears to have showed up for meeting arranged through Int

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated • • Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA01729548 egIllit 1 CASES, --- Fs ILI - -- ' enc: , , • . -CR

or; indictment need not specify the sexual conduct upon which it is based. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Sting U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet No information available but appears to have showed up for meeting arranged through Inte

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA00079477 COURT CASES , FAC:ILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v.

0226316 COURT CASES FACILITY :.FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE E.D. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 E.D. ( Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to be a 16 yr-old gay teen approached a "15 yr-old male teen" on th

no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor, court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder. Internet No information available. 2422(b) 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Sting Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 38874 (W.D. Mo