Epstein Secrets

4212 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION di, CHARGE'S ED. Wis. U.S. I Davidson, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95757 (E.D. Wis. 2006); U.S. I Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (ED. Wis. 2007) Internet Defendant pretending to be a 16 yr-old gay teen approached a "15 yr-old male teen" on the

20 years earlier. Denied. 2422(b); 2423(b) No Information 65 EFTA00224199 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE W.D. Mo. U.S. I Hicks, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet Defendant alleged to have used Internet & telephone to entice a minor; traveled to engage t in sex ac. 2422(b)

inor; indictment need not specify the sexual conduct upon which it is based. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Sin U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1 1429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet No information available but appears to have showed up for meeting arranged through Int

belief that she was 14 yrs-old. 29 EFTA01729513 COURT. . .. . . , • - S ' -- ,S2W114117 - ;FJQCTS'IC0MMUlite4OO,.; •,': -03ARGE U.S. v. Hicks, 457 F.3d 838 (8ih Cir. 2006), overruled Helder, 452 F.3d 751 Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation with "13 yr-old" followed by t

or; indictment need not specify the sexual conduct upon which it is based. 2422(b); 2423; 2252(a)(2) & (a)(4)(B) Not Consummated Sting U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11429 (E.D. Wis. 2007) Internet No information available but appears to have showed up for meeting arranged through Inte

29 EFTA00079442 -;"COHRT; C.ASES C6:”14.111•47.Cia.:e. - :finik 4 ;acIale.40,... - ,,, - ' FACILITY FACZS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v. Hicks. Internet defendant initiated Internet conversation 2422(b); 2423(b) 457 F.3d 838 (8th Cir. 2006), overruled Helder,452 F.3d 751 Stine with "

ature of the attendant at birth, that challenge goes to the weight of the evid- ence, not its admissibility on grounds of authenti- city. See, e.g., Doyle, 130 F.3d at 545 ("(T)he offi- cial does not need to attest to the truth or trustwor- thiness of the facts contained in the document; ac- curacy of i

ation of federal law. This argument is foreclosed by our deci- sions in United States v. Helder, 452 F.3d 751 (8th Cir.2006), and United States v. Hicks, 457 FM 838 (8th Cir2006). In Heftier, we concluded that an actual minor victim is not required for the crime of attempted enticement under § 2422