Epstein Secrets

nited States v. Mardi., 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756, 2011 WL 3421321, at *2 (ND. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011). To rebut the presumption, a defendant need only "show that the specific nature of

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756, 2011 WL 3421321, at *2 (ND. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011). To rebut the presumption, a defendant need only "show that the specific nature of

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756, 2011 WL 3421321, at *2 (ND. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011). To rebut the presumption, a defendant need only "show that the specific nature of

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Mardi., 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756, 2011 WL 3421321, at *2 (ND. Cal. Aug. 3, 2011). To rebut the presumption, a defendant need only "show that the specific nature of

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense