Epstein Secrets

non-material accounting irregularities. Zwirn claims it was on advice of counsel. JEE speaks to Dubin, Zwirn and Zwirn's counsel (Harry Davis from Schulte Roth) about lie and JEE again demands to redeem FTC's entire investment in the Fund. At this time, it is explained that Zwirn is trying to avoid a run o

he Fund's Trading Manager, HCM (DSAM) will use reasonable efforts to provide and will cause Dubin to be reasonably available to market interests of the Zwirn Funds and to consult with Zwirn on investment strategies, to provide the Funds with administrative advice and assistance in connection with matters such

me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment EFTA00729346 • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

n paid though my demand EFTA00729345 for payment has laid idle. Although we are told that the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and that the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the DSAM interests were reduced, and we are told that the

tations made to me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

nvested,and continued to be paid while my demand for payment lay idle. Although we are told the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00731084 aga

tations made to me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

nvested,and continued to be paid while my demand for payment lay idle. Although we are told the Highbridge account was to be run a like a mirror to the Zwirn Funds and the investments were virtually the same, Highbridge monies began to be returned, the Dubin and Sweica interests reduced, and EFTA00587573 aga