Epstein Secrets

non-material accounting irregularities. Zwirn claims it was on advice of counsel. JEE speaks to Dubin, Zwirn and Zwirn's counsel (Harry Davis from Schulte Roth) about lie and JEE again demands to redeem FTC's entire investment in the Fund. At this time, it is explained that Zwirn is trying to avoid a run o

, 2003 Agreement - relating to Zwirn's transition out of direct employment by Highbridge to serving as investment advisor of all of the Funds and a Highbridge managed account. See Harry Susman's brief Memo regarding this agreement which is attached. • As of January 1, 2004 Advisory Agreement, effectuatin

ii) retain brokers and borrow money on behalf of the Fund. • August 1, 2003 Agreement - relating to Zwirn's transition out of direct employment by Highbridge to serving as investment advisor of all of the Funds and a Highbridge managed account. See Harry Susman's brief Memo regarding this agreement which

me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment EFTA00729346 • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

fused to share the vast majority of documents that Kirkland asked for, and that Mike has put forth, to the best of his ability, an argument for why Highbridge was not responsible for the return of my investment. I understand that Mike stated several times his position that neither Highbridge nor you nor H

ocated or transferred investments among the Funds and its managed accounts or how such investments were liquidated or transferred in order to cover Highbridge's redemptions. I EFTA00729347 understood from our last conversation that Zwirn had previously refused to give you an accounting even though you a

tations made to me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

he has refused to share the vast majority of documents that they had asked for, and he has put forth to the best of his ability an argument for why Highbridge was in no way responsible for the return of my investment. He repeatedly stated that neither Highbridge, you or Henry had "control" over the invest

e course of the settlement negotiations and for wrongfully inducing Jeepers to enter into the Agreement. However, it is clear that no claim against Schulte Roth could be pursued absent termination, as they are released under the terms of paragraph 6. 4 EFTA00731204 Attorney Work Product Privileged and C

against the Fund. Section Two of this memorandum addresses any claims that Jeepers might have against Glenn Dubin ("Dubin") or Highbridge Capital ("Highbridge"), including the extent to which Dubin or Highbridge are covered by the terms of the Settlement Agreement and a discussion of potential claims that

is couns=l confirmed "Had he known , he would never have convinced you to only=put in for your 80 million withdrawal". He is in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that is really when=20 he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbri

a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that is really when=20 he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge was owned my JPM at that time. This is ugly. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be =ttor

is counsel confirmed "Had he known , he would never have convinced you to only put in for your 80 million withdrawal". He is in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that is really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge

in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that is really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge was owned my JPM at that time. This is ugly. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be atto

is counsel confirmed "Had he known , he would never have convinced you to only put in for your 80 million withdrawal". H= is in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that i= really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge

in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that i= really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge was owned my JPM at that time. This is ugly. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorn

is counsel confirmed "Had he known , he would never have convinced you to only put in for your 80 million withdrawal". H= is in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that i= really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge

in a box. We know that Schulte Roth was called in in May 06 , so that i= really when he first found out. The money for the plane was taken from the Highbridge managed acct. Highbridge was owned my JPM at that time. This is ugly. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorn

tations made to me by Zwirn caused me to send an additional notice in February 2007 demanding redemption of my entire investment • In March 2007, Schulte Roth informed me that both my November 2006 and February 2007 redemption requests were denied. As I have stated previously, Schulte Roth claimed that my

he has refused to share the vast majority of documents that they had asked for, and he has put forth to the best of his ability an argument for why Highbridge was in no way responsible for the return of my investment. He repeatedly stated that neither Highbridge, you or Henry had "control" over the invest

, Perry Gruss, sometime 5 in the future. 03:16:18 6 That Mr. Kahn had showed up on most of 7 the e-mail with respect to the airplane which 8 Schulte Roth had been -- I believe it was, Schulte 9 Roth had been called in in May of '06, my best 10 recollection, sir, to deal with the issues of the 03:1

ear that they didn't have the 23 liquidity to make my first $80 million withdrawal, 24 that the airplane was -- the money was taken from 25 the Highbridge-managed account. 03:33:07 VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY www.veritext.com EFTA00299310 Page 227 1 Epstein 2 And had he known that there was fun