Epstein Secrets

urdensome and over- broad, but also constituted a fishing expedition un- related to the issues raised by the pleadings. In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 95 (Fla.1995), the supreme court held that certi- orari was available and should be used to quash an order "to the extent that it pe

esent controversy but which might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 2 http://web2.westlaw

urdensome and over- broad, but also constituted a fishing expedition un- related to the issues raised by the pleadings. In Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91, 95 (Fla.1995), the supreme court held that certi- orari was available and should be used to quash an order "to the extent that it pe

esent controversy but which might possibly lead to evidence supporting some subsequent cause of action is quashed. COBB and PETERSON, IL, concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist.,2001. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parrish O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.corn/pr

t to the subject matter of the case and must be admiss- ible or reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. See Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.l995); Amerce v. Newman, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995); Russell v. Stardust Cruis- ers, Inc., 690 So.2d 743 (Ha. 5th DCA 1997). The

m discovery." Motion for Clarification GRANTED as stated above; Motion for Rehearing and Certification DENIED. HARRIS and THOMPSON. JJ., concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist..1997. Balas v. Ruzzo 703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly O2375. 23 Ma. L. Weekly D169 END OF DOCUMENT CI 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Cl

t to the subject matter of the case and must be admiss- ible or reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. See Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995); Amente v. Newman, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995); Russell v. Stardust Cruis- ers, Inc., 690 So.2d 743 (Ha. 5th DCA 1997). The

m discovery." Motion for Clarification GRANTED as stated above; Motion for Rehearing and Certification DENIED. HARRIS and THONIPSON,JJ., concur. Fla.App. 5 Dist..1997. Batas v. Rune 703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly 1D2375, 23 Ma. I— Weekly D169 END OF DOCUMENT O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Cla