Epstein Secrets

on January 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN Angela M. Many (FBN Primary: Primary:

ry: Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel Jro DeJendan&Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, Courthouse Com

uest for Admission and requires Epstein to substantively answer, Epstein would consistently assert his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976); Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). 4 EFTA00808722 Florida Statutes section 90.901 p

on January 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] By: Is/ Scott J. Link (FBN Kara Berard Rockenbach BN Angela M.

for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST 5 EFTA00808730 Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, •. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, Courthouse Co

er registration page, Epstein], if required to answer, would substantively and consistently assert his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976); Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). 4 EFTA00808729 records to self-authenticate (§

February , 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 727-3600; (561) 727-3601 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44

or Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein 2 EFTA00792609 SERVICE LIST Jack Scarola Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, Courthouse Co

t or deny this request because it requires the disclosure of information which could communicate a statement of fact that is testimonial in nature. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). Epstein has a substantial and EFTA00792608 reasonable basis for concern that the statements of fact th

, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney scarola Barnhart & P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Shipley, Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. K

s a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000); Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976)• McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also

that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe. 465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id, at 428. 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, 1487 U.S.,I at EFTA00221

404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Counsel for Plaintiff C.MA. Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barthian & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff Service List in the manner specified by Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Wei

ubpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see ado Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). The priv

that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237. Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 10 EFTA00234830 causesabeftemenmisn R9seurniitilit51712 EngigMergrl-PPRP098

served by mail vA this Cl day of February, 2011 on: Jack Scarola Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Marc S. Nurik, Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Attorneys for Scott Rothstein One E. Broward Blvd., Ste 700 Fort Lauderda

asis for protecting Diaz's earlier communications because those communications were not made for the purpose of receiving said legal services). See Fisher v. U.S., 425 U.S. 391, 403 (attorney-client privilege "protects only those disclosures necessary to obtain informed legal advice which might not hav

Phone: Fax: Co-counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: Fax: [email protected] inh@searcvlaw,com Counsel for Plaintiff... Adam Horowitz, Esq. Stuart Mermelstei

s a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v, Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000)• Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also