Epstein Secrets

(NC) Citizen-Times <https://www.citizen-times.com/story/newillocal/2020/08/24/trump- protesters-came-out-force-mills-river-visit/3431404001/> (8/24, Boyle, 138K) reports, "It's not often that this sleepy, mostly rural hamlet sees the kind of excitement it had Aug. 24," as "hundreds of fans of President

regards safety." The Washington Post <https://www.washingtonpost.corn/education/2020/08/24/florida-judge-blocks-state-order- schools-reopen/> (8/24, Strauss, 14.2M) reports that an "appeal by the state means that school districts cannot immediately move to change their reopening plans for starting the 20

y known the first visit to Henderson County by a sitting president since George H.W. Bush visited in 1992." The Asheville (NC) Citizen-Times (8/24, Boyle, 138K) reports, "It's not often that this sleepy, mostly rural hamlet sees the kind of excitement it had Aug. 24," as "hundreds of fans of Presiden

protection equipment. The state order to open is unconstitutional to the extent that it arbitrarily disregards safety." The Washington Post (8/24, Strauss, 14.2M) reports that an "appeal by the state means that school districts cannot immediately move to change their reopening plans for starting the 2

y known the first visit to Henderson County by a sitting president since George H.W. Bush visited in 1992." The Asheville (NC) Citizen-Times (8/24, Boyle, 138K) reports, "It's not often that this sleepy, mostly rural hamlet sees the kind of excitement it had Aug. 24," as "hundreds of fans of Presiden

ipment. The state order to open is unconstitutional to the extent that it arbitrarily disregards safety." EFTA01658448 The Washington Post (8/24, Strauss, 14.2M) reports that an "appeal by the state means that school districts cannot immediately move to change their reopening plans for starting the 2

g motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas and permitting ex parte applications "if the movant can articulate a reason why it should be"); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (requiring noticed motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas to "assur[e] that such subp

in response to Rule 17(c) subpoenas be treated as confidential under the protective order and disclosed to the Government. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney by: Is/ Assistant United States Attorneys cc: Counsel of Record (by ECF) EFTA00018246

g motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas and permitting ex parte applications "if the movant can articulate a reason why it should be"); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (requiring noticed motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas to "assur[e] that such subp

in response to Rule 17(c) subpoenas be treated as confidential under the protective order and disclosed to the Government. Respectfully submitted, AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney by: Is/ Assistant United States Attorneys cc: Counsel of Record (by ECF) EFTA00022037