Epstein Secrets

rds is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed.” Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2008 Page 1 of 2 2 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right

. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the

n of justice and hence may have to be curtailed.” Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). T

inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). “The right to inspect

ds is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 'The parties are reminded that all documents filed conventionally (including those filed under seal) must be filed with the C

. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the