Epstein Secrets

your left leaning , is in conflict with a money prize , we could substitute —your prize money goes to charity,- airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea, . and 1000 blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes 1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) EFTA00691301

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate diffi factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, we'd

our left leaning , is in conflict with a money prize , we could substitute --your prize money goes to charity,- airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea, . and 1000 blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes 1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) please note Th

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate diffi factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, have

our left leaning , is in conflict with a money prize , we could substitute --your prize money goes to charity,- airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea, . and 1000 blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes 1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) please note Th

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, we'd

ing , is in conflict with a money prize, we could </=pan>substitute ---your prize money goes to charity,-&n=sp; airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea= . and 1000 blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes&nbs=; 1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) please no

=at. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isola=e difft factors in •syntax• as a small set of constraints can do s=me of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity prin=iple' about the interpretation of points moving in the vi=ual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4=are much harder, we'd

left leaning , is in confli=t with a money prize , we could su=stitute ---your prize money goes to charity,- airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea, . and 1000=blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes 1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) <=div> pl

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft fa=tors in *syntax" as a small set of constraints can do some of th=t. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity principle =80 about the interpretation of points moving in the visual fi=ld - same coherence idea. EFTA_R1_01610323 EFTA02489677 Chall

our left leaning, is=in conflict with a money prize, we could substitute ---your prize money goes to charity,- airline tickets to the Gaza strip. - Nicaragua, North Korea, .=and 1000 blank ,protest placards ? or top prize includes =1000 protesters of your choice for three demonstrations :) please note

=div>Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft =actors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of =hat. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity principle=E2 about the interpretation of points moving EFTA_R1_01610440 EFTA02489761 in the visual=field - same coherence idea. Challe