hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate diffi factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, we'd

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate diffi factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, have

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft factors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's `rigidity principle' about the interpretation of points moving in the visual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4 are much harder, we'd

=at. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isola=e difft factors in •syntax• as a small set of constraints can do s=me of that. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity prin=iple' about the interpretation of points moving in the vi=ual field - same coherence idea. Challenges 3 and 4=are much harder, we'd

hat. Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft fa=tors in *syntax" as a small set of constraints can do some of th=t. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity principle =80 about the interpretation of points moving in the visual fi=ld - same coherence idea. EFTA_R1_01610323 EFTA02489677 Chall

=div>Further than 1. That system I showed you that can isolate difft =actors in *syntax* as a small set of constraints can do some of =hat. Recall Shimon Ullman's 'rigidity principle=E2 about the interpretation of points moving EFTA_R1_01610440 EFTA02489761 in the visual=field - same coherence idea. Challe