Epstein Secrets

297 put it before the negotiations began on Tuesday: "We need to move towards a trust-building road map with the Westerners." Such sweet talk— and the White House's strong desire to avoid a confrontation with Tehran— could result in a dangerous deal that would lift international sanctions on Iran without ensurin

ject: October 16 update Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:30:45 +0000 16 October, 2013 Article 1. The Wall Street Journal Four Possible Deals with Iran Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov Article 2. Foreign Policy Democrats, Israel Lobby Threaten Iran Talks Yochi Dreazen, John Hudson Article 3. Bloomberg Five Thi

President Obama expressed solidarity with Israel and also said that diplomacy remains the "preferred solution." But you know, Bibi, that most times this White House is too nice about saying hard things to you. And maybe you won't get the message. Let me spell out what I think President Obama is saying to you: t

compromise. Give sanctions time to play out. EFTA00687009 You cannot actually believe Iran will prostrate itself in the face of your threats. As Amos Yadlin, a retired Air Force general and former head of Israeli military intelligence, said Sunday: "These statements have reached the point where they hav

ran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, that conclusion should solidify support for what would then become the inevitable Israeli strike. A refusal by the White House to seek such a joint resolution would itself suggest that, while "all options are on the table," the likelihood is that that is precisely where the

force only reinforces the view that the United States will not do so. Almost simultaneously, the former head of Israeli military intelligence Gen. Amos Yadlin weighed in. In an interview with the Times of Israel, he described the situation: "The diplomatic negotiations that took place in Istanbul, Baghdad