Epstein Secrets

ba Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Czech Republic Denmark Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Ecuador Supplementary Egypt Stoned; gntered into Force; March 1, 1933 November 14, 1935 June 8, 1972 January 21, 1977 June 3, 1996 July 1, 1999 June 10, 1997 June 14, 2000 May 14, 1974 May 8, 19

935 AprH 26, 2000 * Under Treaty with United Kingdom. ** Under Treaty with Yugoslavia which entered into force in 1902. + Considered a Treaty in Force by U.S., but not by Colombia Citation (if any): 47 StaL 2122 28 UST 5290 32 UST 3111 28 UST 227 32 UST 1310 28 UST 227 TIAS 10850 43 Stat.

FBI: `We still have a pending case' 0. EPSTEIN from Ill and Donald Trump among his friends "Highly unusear is hoe: Palm Beach Police Chief Mi- chael Reiter described State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case in a bluntly critical letter to Krischer last year before Epstein was indicted.

described State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case in a bluntly critical letter to Krischer last year before Epstein was indicted. Reiter referred the mat- ter to the FBI to determine whether any federa: laws had been violated. Epstein's afits countered by attacking the chief person

- January 21, 1977 December 23, 1986 Pending April 11, 1984 April 14, 1923 June 12, 1902 - June 24, 1935 April 26, 2000 + Considered a Treaty in Force by U.S., but not by Colombia Citation (if any): 47 Stat. 2122 28 UST 5290 32 UST 3111 28 UST 227 32 UST 1310 28 UST 227 TIAS 10850 43 Stat. 1698

OUSE_OVERSIGHT_021452 FBI: We still have > EPSTEIN fom 1B and Donald Trump among his friends. “Highly unusual’ is how Palm Beach Police Chief Mi- chael Reiter described State Attorney Barry Krischer’s handling of the case in a bluntly critical letter to Krischer last year before Epstein was indicted. Reite

eiter described State Attorney Barry Krischer’s handling of the case in a bluntly critical letter to Krischer last year before Epstein was indicted. Reiter referred the mat- ‘ter to the FBI to determine whether any federal laws had been violated. Epstein’s allies countered by attacking the chief personal

tante (s) irultplynd that 61/i betray by be ambit* pane* dirk is. and bit aidno he robbed smut kr Oath del in to Sling C)tte (Days m prod) the lost Force Chirps la to blind Cy-betel*, suet& Faris OLvgm tr eshcharge YAM b Do E You Think You Rod o MOWN on Your Shamed Ropdro y w NM OdttMt Fiat RommUaloo

cm* ti los roast mdCirect DePasts So* Sete* lets Reiter* Pepnents et TO St WI FA CIRECTCCP3SIT HAS BEEN

victims who are entitled to 63 Td. 4 See, e.g., Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330,339 (1979). 6 OL

nal justice process." !° After successfully passing many state constitutional amendments, crime victims' rights advocates sought to achieve the Task Force's broadest recommendation: to secure protection for victims' rights in the U.S. Constitution. In 1996, victims’ advocates proposed a Victims' Rights

A. 9/21/05 On September 19, 2005, I met with Officer Pagan and received the information pertaining to this case. Members of the Burglary Strike Force had previously been conducting surveillance on both Epstein and Robson. Officer Munyan was assigned to monitor the Epstein home and Sgt Sorge and O

eing offered. However I expressed that was only my opinion and the final approval would come from the Chief of Police. She explained to have Chief Reiter call Barry Krisher about the deal. I left the area and returned to the police station where I briefed the Chief about the deal offered. I checked