Epstein Secrets

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH'. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00602404 -

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dc.fendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00792566

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dcfendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); people v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratui

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00181213 -

n - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 danyappea s any.nyc.gov GINA MIGNOLA