Epstein Secrets

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

ened their own grand jury investigation; and that defendant entered into a federal non-prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney of the Southern District of Florida, under which he agreed to plead guilty to an additional state felony charge that carried a consecutive jail sentence and required registr

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); People v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(`While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratu

ened their own grand jury investigation; and that defendant entered into a federal non-prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney of the Southern District of Florida, under which he agreed to plead guilty to an additional state felony charge that carried a consecutive jail sentence and required registr

f law were sufficient where thay were "clear, supported by the record, and sufficiently detailed to permit intelligent appellate review"); people v. Belzer, 84 A.D.3d 905, 906 (2d Dept. 2011)(While a SORA determination should be supported by findings of fact, there is no need for a court to make gratui

ened their own grand jury investigation; and that defendant entered into a federal non-prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney of the Southern District of Florida, under which he agreed to plead guilty to an additional state felony charge that carried a consecutive jail sentence and required registr