Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00079409

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

u.s _ ems •wr ar . l'n-, r tr.S. '‘.e.._,....,t4's"- :‘-11; "t''st ;$....iA cf.. s. ' -,., -,s.v,:e isttif:ot e. lit F .i. 2.‘" -ci v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10ih Cir. 2006) Unpublished No discussion of facility but appears to be phone No specific information available other t

ding the distribution of narcotics, use of force and possession of firearms were present. See U.S. v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). In addition, the telephone and not the Internet served as the "facility or instrument" of interstate commerce

d. 2422(6); 2423; 1956 No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 74 EFTA00079487 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin

EFTA00224129

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

cases include violence, distribution of rircotics, use of force and possession of firearms and the like. ns, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); US. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). The only o er instance where the telephone provided the sole basis for a charge under 2422(b) presented a situ

ial denied. No Information ***Conspiracy/ Pimps 77 EFTA00224211 COURT aCAS -. .. . lit FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE N.D. Ohio Chilleme I U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicating

EFTA01729480

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

5 , , d • ', •"„ 1 4 , • tWlibia.,rs tj '51 ltAMe m psi , O _ , i.:•. t -..it, • '',...‘ t v ye. .. ' toemt ...t.' ":1t; e ' U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10'1' Unpublished No discussion of No specific information available other than the fact that the case involved a 2422(b)

FTA01729558 COURT ' - ‘.,-: ' CAS ,7,-...k.. „ .1y- " • .., • _%.-L,..,--- • :.FAOIL .2 •MO A, :.1trCFStc 1.4,11,O4 • , "..; N.D. Ohio Chilleme v. U.S.. 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25920 (N.D. Ohio 2006) Dismissed by 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38800 Internet Defendant believed he was communicatin