Epstein Secrets

u.s _ ems •wr ar . l'n-, r tr.S. '‘.e.._,....,t4's"- :‘-11; "t''st ;$....iA cf.. s. ' -,., -,s.v,:e isttif:ot e. lit F .i. 2.‘" -ci v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10ih Cir. 2006) Unpublished No discussion of facility but appears to be phone No specific information available other t

ding the distribution of narcotics, use of force and possession of firearms were present. See U.S. v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). In addition, the telephone and not the Internet served as the "facility or instrument" of interstate commerce

ggitii i-' m:4 4aN.,-2 ,: # 'W fi 0 e IS. ,, .. '131b6; .,... .,j. 4Stalit . SeAa( ;17 : -: 1 :rW . :741f . VittilbtfrSlic: "M U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12791 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having se

cases include violence, distribution of rircotics, use of force and possession of firearms and the like. ns, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); US. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). The only o er instance where the telephone provided the sole basis for a charge under 2422(b) presented a situ

victim of porn is person depicted so 3 separate counts of porn. 60 EFTA00224194 COURT CASES '' FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. I Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12791 (11ih Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having se

5 , , d • ', •"„ 1 4 , • tWlibia.,rs tj '51 ltAMe m psi , O _ , i.:•. t -..it, • '',...‘ t v ye. .. ' toemt ...t.' ":1t; e ' U.S. v. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10'1' Unpublished No discussion of No specific information available other than the fact that the case involved a 2422(b)

. 2422(b); 2252(a)(1) Not Consummated Sting 59 EFTA01729543 COST. ' :cASES, _ ' • ACtLJTY : FACTS/071WAPSIOthiON • C 9 , .. U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12791 (1 Ph Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having se

include violence, distribution of rcotics, T use of force and possession of firearms and the like. . Evans, 476 F.3d 1176 (11th Cir. 2007); U.S. Phillips, 165 Fed. Appx. 677 (10th Cir. 2006). The only of er ins ce where the telephone provided the sole basis for a charge under 2422(b) presented a situ

2422(6); 2423(b) Consummated 62 EFTA00226334 COURT 1 "-r..i a y --' - • • — FACZITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION •-.. . .. CHARGE . . U.S. v. Rader, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12'791 (11th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Internet conversations with undercover agent; sent videos of adults having s

(Appeals) (INTAKE) (Fel R) (So Cnty) (INTAKE) Payne, Both' (Gun Club) Penh, Nicoll* (So env) Penn, Candace (Eco Crimes) Philip, Eva (HOM) Phillips, Marci (Traf Hom) Pierce, Rita (CC P) Pine, Damaris (INVEST) Poulton, Bryan (HOM) Powell, Lynn (INTAKE) Powlis, Melanie DOVE -TD) Quintan

vii Sarah Horrn Rachel Sym KNOW SOMETI WE DOI Email us at: tips@radarr. or IM: TIpRt TODAY'S Brand Larc How luxury I fabulous The Summ( Rader looks season's big disappointm Shoe and T Can you ide presidential footwear? \A about the m Knockoff N The Radar c for counted( The 'Stach