Document Mentions (4 shared documents)

EFTA00630968

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

<[email protected]> Subject: Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:16:09 +0000 Attachments: ATT00001.txt; IMG_3098.PNG Hi sweet pea - Got this text from Humphrey last night - it sounds like a case of crossed wires as Humphrey would never go ahead with a sale that he wasn't given the go-ahead for. It is not in

at all, he is very professional and shafting a client is no way to get repeat business. I think he is also getting some conflicting info from both Olivier and Terje, but as I am the one who called him on your behalf, he considers you the primary buyer to offer for the stone so would never do anything u

EFTA00631769

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

From: To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 19:16:47 +0000 Humphrey has made a very good point - you should get the stone re-certified by the GIA - the current certificate is 12 yrs old and it would also clarify the

prehy is NOT authorized to sell. he is sending me a confriming text , this is why i dont deal in jewels On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:22 PM, wrote: Olivier Colom has just given Humphrey the go-ahead to sell the stone - what do you want to do? Sent from my iPhone On 16 Aug 2017, at 15:19, jeffrey E. <jeevacat

EFTA02343295

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

From: Sent: urs ay, ugust , : To: jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Humphrey has made a very good point - you should get the stone re-certified by the GIA - the current certificate is 12 yrs old and it would also clarify the

s NOT authorized to sell. he is sending me a confriming text , this is why i dont deal in jewels On Wed Au 16 2017 at 12:22 PM, <mailt > wrote: Olivier Colom has just given Humphrey the go-ahead to sell the stone - what do you want to do? Sent from my iPhone On 16 Aug 2017, at 15:19, jeffrey E. <jeevacat