Epstein Secrets

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York. NY 10036 212 506 3900 main 212 506 3955 direct www.steoloccorn nreeinoartenOsteotoe.com July 11, 2019 V

-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York. NY 10036

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten July 11, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M. Berman United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse (212

-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 16 Reid Weingarten July 11, 2019 VIA ECF The Honorable Richard M.

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law

smit Information About a Mi- nor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(3XE). (121 The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutted. Martir, EFTA00066200 316 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 782 F.2d at 1144. If the defendant comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger t

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law

smit Information About a Mi- nor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(3XE). (121 The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutted. Martir, EFTA00076824 316 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 782 F.2d at 1144. If the defendant comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger t

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

tect the safety of the community, and that any application for bail should be denied. Southern District of New York Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00024593

of New York Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Ber

15 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant EFTA00015545 ---

2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant EFTA00015545 ---

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

By: GEOF REY S. BERMAN United States Attome Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00028306

York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Ber

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

15 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Ber

2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Ber

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

By: GEOF REY S. BERMAN United States Attome Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00030841

York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Ber