Epstein Secrets

s of Al Hara- main have since been designated. See Exec. Order No. 13224 (designating BIF (November 19, 2002) and branches of Al Haramain (Bosnia, Somalia on March 11, 2002; Indonesia, Kenya, Pakistan, Tanza- nia on January 22, 2004; Afghanistan, Al- bania, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, the Nether- lands on Ju

("Prince Sultan"), HRH Prince Turki AI- Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud ("Prince Turld"),± and the National Commercial Corp.. 03 Civ. 5738 (S.D.N.Y.); Salvo v. AI Qaeda Islamic Army, 03 Civ. 5071 (S.D.N.Y.); and Tremsky v. Osama bin Laden, 02 Civ. 7300 (S.D.N.Y.). Plaintiffs in these cases filed conso

.V.NfObN ND 29979496G 9 49 = you() VOID VOID 4561 999 &CLISIHI41 Caw TICICCCIOCIPCCORAM. A.troicosnaommx mato Ivo BANKSONE tt ate I S Somalia This o‘e0 Is tadbraYpApcses thy 0746:70N 200 794900 .ctizatOID VOID VOID BANK1ONE &,•••••••41c iiviemurganteami tc.19/bast. 04 CHI Den $ De

orNaukat.can, Vim thava p/r4apa: aro na. 10.00.d NA we cos Mlpytu ponial Amelia &map ID yac (add rang Csi i•500.055.800 (ccaw1 1.33249442:01 War In Salvo can ant a sabton to your int.,10.nlatuaton. REWARDS SUMMARY Prooloos Pont Sanwa Pad 80..r.•5 for Frame chwges Peen owed en avretatan Tali pews

ms In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Tremsky v. Qsama Bin Laden Salvo v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Federal In- surance v. Al Qaida Barrera v. Al Qae- da Islamic Army Vigilant Insurance

ches of Al Hara- main have since been designated. See Exec. Order No. 18224 (designating BIF (November 19, 2002) and branches of Al Haramain (Bosnia, Somalia on March 11, 2002; Indonesia, Kenya, Pakistan, Tanza- nia on January 22, 2004; Afghanistan, Al- bania, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, the Nether- lands on Jun

d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 [4] [5] @ Matters considered in general Article stating that Islamic aid organizations in Afghanistan, Bosnia, Somalia, and Tajikistan provided funds and cover to terrorists would not be admitted to supplement record on motion to dismiss in action, arising out of the

nt by Taha Al-Awani, Muhammad 392 F.Supp.2d 539, 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 Footnotes 1 SHC moves to dismiss the Ashton, Burnett, Federal, Barrera, and Salvo complaints. The Court consolidated Barrera v. al Qaeda Islamic Army, 03 Civ. 7038, with Ashton on December 6, 2004. Similarly, at Plaintiffs’ request